Detailed analysis of signal integrity and power integrity

I recently came across a question about power integrity on a forum. Many users wondered why signal integrity is often emphasized so much, while power integrity seems to get less attention. They pointed out that for low-frequency applications, the design of switching power supplies is usually handled through experience or functional-level simulations. Power integrity analysis doesn’t seem very helpful in such cases. For frequencies between 50MHz and 100MHz, using design rules of thumb or even Excel tools provided by chip manufacturers can be sufficient. However, when it comes to applications above 100MHz, it's typically an IC-level concern, and board-level power integrity simulation isn't always meaningful unless you have a full chip-to-chip solution with package and chip models. Is this really the case? Actually, there are still many things you can do to improve power integrity. Let’s take a closer look. Signal Integrity (SI) and Power Integrity (PI) are two closely related but distinct analyses that ensure the proper operation of digital circuits. In SI, the goal is to make sure that a transmitted '1' looks like a '1' at the receiver (and similarly for '0'). In PI, the focus is on ensuring that the driver and receiver receive enough current to transmit and receive those signals correctly. Therefore, power integrity can be seen as a crucial part of signal integrity. Both are essentially about analyzing the correct analog behavior of digital circuits. The necessity of these analyses stems from the limitations of computational resources. If we had infinite computing power, we could simulate the entire circuit once and identify all potential issues. However, due to practical constraints, different domain-specific analyses allow us to target specific problems without having to simulate everything. For example, in signal integrity, the focus is on the path from the transmitter to the receiver. Models can be created for just the transmitter, receiver, and the interconnects in between, making the simulation manageable. On the other hand, power integrity is more complex because its boundaries are not as clear-cut and often depend on the same factors as signal integrity. In SI, the primary goals are to eliminate signal quality issues, crosstalk, and timing problems. These require accurate models of drivers, receivers, chip packages, and board interconnects (like traces, vias, and connectors). The driver and receiver models include parameters such as buffer impedance, toggle rate, and voltage swing. IBIS or SPICE models are commonly used for these buffers. These models are then combined with interconnect models to simulate how the signal behaves at the receiver. Interconnects, especially board traces, behave like transmission lines. They have characteristics such as impedance, delay, and loss, which influence how signals interact between the driver and receiver. Electromagnetic properties must be modeled using field solvers to create S-parameter models or equivalent circuit components. Most traces can be modeled as uniform cross-sections, which is sufficient for calculating their impedance. This impedance affects the waveform shape at the receiver. Vias, however, are more complex to model than traces. Their modeling becomes critical for high-speed signals, where a three-dimensional field solver is often needed. Fast, single-ended signals passing through vias interact strongly with the power distribution network (PDN), which includes stitching holes, capacitors, and plane pairs. These components also need to be modeled for power integrity analysis. Power integrity analysis involves higher frequency energy distributed across the board's planes, making it more complex than signal integrity. At DC, modeling is straightforward, involving trace resistance and planar shapes. But at high frequencies, analyzing the impedance between the power supply and ground at various points on the PDN requires detailed calculations. Factors like capacitor placement, mounting style, and capacitance value affect the impedance. High-frequency effects like mounting inductors and planar inductors must be included in the model to achieve accurate decoupling results. A simple lumped analysis can serve as a preliminary check, while a distributed analysis ensures that the PDN meets all impedance requirements across the board. Signal integrity simulations focus on signal quality, crosstalk, and timing. Ensuring clean edges with minimal overshoot and undershoot is key. Termination techniques help match impedance and reduce reflections. Timing simulations determine how long it takes for a signal to travel across the board, which is critical for system timing. Crosstalk simulations help determine the minimum spacing between traces to prevent interference. Power integrity simulations include DC voltage drop analysis, decoupling analysis, and noise analysis. DC voltage drop analysis helps identify areas of high current density and potential thermal hotspots. Decoupling analysis aims to minimize the impedance between the power supply and ground at different IC locations, driving changes in capacitor values, types, and placements. Noise analysis examines how noise propagates through the board and is affected by the PDN. The PDN serves both as a current supply and a return path for signals. Vias act as return paths for signals, and their modeling is essential for accurate signal integrity and power integrity analysis. Coupling between vias and the PDN can be analyzed to reduce noise and improve performance. As technology advances, the integration of signal and power integrity analyses becomes increasingly important. With better modeling tools and computing power, simulating both together provides deeper insights into circuit behavior, leading to more optimized designs. Several considerations are vital in power integrity design: 1. **Power System Noise Margin Analysis**: Chips have defined operating voltage ranges. For example, if a chip operates between 3.13V and 3.47V, and the regulator outputs 3.36V, the allowable voltage variation is 110mV. The noise margin is calculated based on the regulator's accuracy and load conditions. 2. **Sources of Power Supply Noise**: Ripple from the power supply, slow response to load changes, and voltage drops due to parasitic inductance in the power path all contribute to noise. 3. **Capacitor Decoupling**: Capacitors are the main method for reducing power supply noise. From an energy storage perspective, they act as local power sources during transient currents. From an impedance standpoint, they lower the overall impedance of the power system, improving stability. 4. **Capacitor Characteristics**: Real-world capacitors have parasitic elements like ESR and ESL. Understanding their frequency response is crucial for selecting the right capacitors. Larger capacitors may have lower ESL but higher ESR, affecting their performance. 5. **Local Decoupling Design**: Placing capacitors close to the device reduces the impact of parasitic inductance. Multiple capacitors in parallel can further reduce series inductance and improve performance. Proper power integrity design ensures stable power delivery, minimizes noise, and supports reliable high-speed digital performance.

Motherboard

All-in-one motherboard,Industrial computer motherboard,Highly integrated motherboard

HuiZhou GreenTouch Technology Co.,Ltd , https://www.bbstouch.com