I have been burning for a few months, this is the first time to seriously write a review, please enthusiasts support more advice. The following evaluation is about 100 hours of listening to the JVC-FX800. I don't have higher-end earplugs than the FX800, so I only have some comparisons based on the plugs I have and can borrow (PK2, Zombie Mark Rabbit, Asilui AM800, TF10).
The front end is a colorful C3. I am mainly engaged in portability. I feel that I can't bear it more than the C3. The sound quality of the C3 is also very good in the player under a thousand dollars. My own listening is very omnivorous, and classical, electronic, and vocal are all heard more.
In 2012, JVC launched the new flagship FX800 for wood diaphragm headphones. JVC FX800 uses all-natural wood diaphragm as the core of pronunciation, not only has the highest transient response of all diaphragm materials (acoustic response test proves that wood diaphragm material is more than 3 times the response speed of other common materials), and the production process It also reached an amazing 0.01mm, achieving the consistency of today's high-definition music requirements.
JVC FX800 product features:
1. The world's first wooden diaphragm, its transient acoustic response speed; more than 3 times that of other materials; using 0.01mm precision wood diaphragm
2. Retain the wooden diaphragm and acoustic cavity of the FX700. Use 10mm wooden diaphragm to improve the bass resolution, provide more stable and rich low frequency and purer medium and high frequency.
3. The drive unit adopts the patented “Double Hybrid Structure†technology, and a large proportion of brass parts are added to the front and rear of the unit. While reducing the oscillation loss, the amplitude is stabilized to achieve higher resolution and clearer audio.
4. Conical structure double damping sound cavity, which enhances the bass effect and makes the sound more natural;
Unpacking
Since my Samsung NOTE phone has been streaking, the camera is a bit rough, and the photos taken are not clear enough. So there are some clear photos taken by my colleague's IPHONE5.
Appearance: Looks very beautiful and beautiful. I have a little control over it. . .
Workmanship: exquisite and sturdy, the quality of workmanship is high, the wire is transparent silver, very beautiful, soft, no memory, no bending. The texture and feel are very good. It is said that the wire is made of 4N-OFC oxygen-free copper wire, but the official parameter is 5N wire. The earplug has three sound holes on the inner side of the ear, which is semi-open. The plug and splitter can be further refined and refined. There is a protrusion on the hub above the splitter, which is used to distinguish the left and right. This design is very detailed.
Wear: Comfortable and firm, it won't be tired for a long time. Sound insulation is not bad, not very stuffy. The stethoscope effect is not very serious and is suitable for street trips.
The accessories are three sets of large and medium-sized silicone sleeves, two sets of sponge sleeves, and a beautifully-made portable storage box. I didn't find these earmuffs just after I opened the box. I thought that there were so few accessories, and later I found it hidden behind the paper strips. The sponge cover is very soundproof but will dilute some of the high frequencies and details. It would be better if you could have more than one clip.
Resolution: High resolution, compared to your own TF10, better than the TF10 details, the instrument separation is very good, it is praiseworthy that the instrument and vocal reproduction is very high, very natural and true. Looking back and listening to the high-resolution TF10 that has been praised, I feel a bit mixed.
Tri-band:
Low frequency: Elasticity is unbeatable, so I like it. . . (Is it because of the wooden diaphragm?), the amount of quality is also good, the dive surrounding the residual sound is also good, the atmosphere has momentum. In general, it is shocking. When the volume is turned up, it seems that you can feel the vibration of the earplugs. If you wear it in your ear, I will imagine that it may break my eardrum. . .
Medium frequency: fine and mellow, restores nature. Vocal voice is better than TF10
High frequency: bright. Seeing someone commenting that there are glitch and tooth sounds, I didn't feel how serious it was.
Sound field: It is larger than the sound field of TF10, and the horizontal and vertical directions are relatively large.
Easy to drive: very easy to drive, suitable for all kinds of direct push.
Image: clear
Tooth sound control: better
Suitable style: omnivorous, LIVE scene will be better
Cost-effective: Feeling cost-effective, look at the price of TF10 now, it is worth the money
After ten days of audition, I feel that the biggest feeling of FX800 is the true and natural reduction, which may be the characteristics of wood diaphragm. However, it seems that the listening is worse, not as good as my zombie Mark Rabbit. It is commendable that Mark Rabbit's low frequency is not much worse than the FX800. . . The high reductiveness of the FX800 should also belong to the category of monitoring earplugs. Look at the product parameters and write it for monitoring. The details of this earphone are very good, plus the real and natural restoration, listening to the scene will be very sensation, so that you feel like you are at the concert scene, watching the movie is also very good.
I didn't have a trial comparison of the singles when I first burned. Please bear with me, personal opinions, for reference only. I hope to have more exchanges with you.
DisplayPort Cable Co., Ltd. , http://www.easycabling.cn